I’m excited about about a more CMS-like approach to a fediverse server, especially one that leans on #IndieWeb building blocks.

  • smallcircles@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    A pity (for me) is the SSPL licensing, probably chosen because of the use of MongoDB. When using an alternative (maybe FerretDB) it could be Apache 2.0, which was the originally intented I heard (and still mentioned on the website).

    • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t know much about open source licensing. What’s wrong with the SSPL and what does that have to do with mongo?

      • smallcircles@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        SSPL is source-available, and not open source. There was lotsa discussion about the SSPL license, which was created by MongoDB, and it is a complex matter with all kinds of judicial angles. In summary it mainly benefits Mongo most of all, whose ‘open source passion’ is marketing-speak mostly. I forgot a lot of ins and outs, but just dug up a random find about downsides (2 parts) and impact.