Fediverse hot takes:

  1. The only true client is the browser.

  2. Microblogging be damned.

  3. it’s the instances/servers that are federated, not the users (ie us) … and damn that too.

@fediverse

#fediverse

  • maegul@hachyderm.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    @fediverse
    7) In the aggregate, #Mastodon / #fediverse are simply unintuitive.

    Add up all of the design missteps or confusions (which happen), mixed and confusing but often strongly felt cultural standards, lacking or hard-to-find documentation or explanations, and, federation strangeness/quirkiness … and you get a platform that crosses past the reasonably intuitive line.

    It’s reparable, but probably not easily so.

    • sexy_peach@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Have you ever used Facebook? That is unintuitive. Twitter as well, most of the big platforms are.

    • maegul@hachyderm.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      @fediverse
      8) The ideal fediverse is (?):

      1. Everyone is on single-user instances with much personal control (hosted by one of many services).
      2. People congregate in various “platforms as communities”, which is where the real moderating and community management happens.
      3. A variety of software and platform options exist for both the user-instances and community platforms.

      The flaw of the #fediverse is that it conflates hosting and community services (ie, 1 & 2) and so underperforms at both.