Until now, development has proceeded pretty loosely - we work on whatever seems cool at the time. This is fine but if we collaborate on a decision about priorities then perhaps we’ll all be pulling in the same direction a bit more often. If the decision is made in public with all stakeholders, perhaps we’ll get some buy-in.
Let’s try this: each of us pick up to 5 issues from the issue queue that are important and up to 5 issues that are urgent. If an issue is both important and urgent, include it in both lists - these are the issues we really want to highlight.
After a few days we’ll collate the results and try to find issues that most people think are both important and urgent.
This process is open to anyone who regularly uses PieFed.
I’ll come back to this later, but for now:
I need to investigate setting up piefed in production, partly because I keep blowing through my ngrok quota, but mostly because many of the Issues on codeberg don’t become apparent or relevant in testing.
I agree with you that getting the fundamentals right for what is currently here is way more important than trying to change it into something else (i.e. do a few things well, rather than lots of things badly)
If you need any help getting it all set up, let me know.
Hetzner has cheap VPS , especially their Shared ARM ones - € 3.79 per month. 1 or 2 cores is fine for a single user instance. Piefed.social was using only 2 Arm cores until very recently.