Lucy :3

Well it does make a significant difference for diagnosing; multiple being slow can mean they’re just (D)DOS’d (eg. by scrapers), and the unaffected use Anubis, know the user agents, blocked the IPs etc.; down could mean that the latest lemmy update had a bug and is crashing.

.dev is slow, but not down

All up for me (Frankfurt IP Address, FF nightly)

I’d guess all of the braindeads who’d fall for that are not in the fediverse anyway.

Yes. It’s very likely only a simple terminal app that launches top. Top in termux (a more powerful Terminal) looks like this:

Exactly

Ig it means it was offloaded (so the core app itself was deleted, but not the user data) and you need to reinstall it?

Wanted to say: No, according to Wikipedia global search launched in 2020.

But that actually was 5 years ago, damn.

No, afaik. Building on your phone would be very slow anyways. Idk what shelter is, there are way too many projects with that name on GH. If it’s a slow releasing app, you could build it once and install it. Otherwise, maybe fork it and set up releases there.

I have it on Android 13, albeit badly patched. Maybe older versions have a critical security bug in the implementation, for which they need longer than the disclosure time to fix or are unable to do at all?

Without Wi-Fi or cellular connection

But a USB-C -> Ethernet adapter or what? Just say without internet access ffs

Jup.

banned slogan of the NSDAP’s paramilitary “Sturmabteilung”.

They say/write “they banned for X, but I didn’t do X”, instead of “they banned me for X, but X isn’t even forbidden”, even though it clearly is.

As I said, the report itself is just a compilation of publicly known and collected information. You’d be essentially distrusting that 1 + 1 = 2, because the 5 page mathematical proof is no open to the public. Of course, the actual proof that 1+1=2 is open, but you hopefully get the point.

The VS is completely independent. There are no politicians behind it. Otherwise, the whole thing wouldn’t make sense. Even your source says so.

The status hasn’t been revoked at all. That’s a common misconception. It’s not being taken back, obviously. They are just not calling them extremist openly, until there is a first decision in the lawsuit. Just as any other lawsuit for eg. defamation, no matter which side is on the right - you’ll first be ordered to stop openly calling the other party a liar or similar, or stop doing that by yourself. Again, your source literally states this.

If you want a more complete list, check the mentioned “secret report” in readable form here, or in original form (hand scanned from paper as to be expected by an official german government body in 2025): part A and part B. The original leaker article is actually largely hidden behind a paywall (https://www.cicero.de/innenpolitik/cicero-veroffentlicht-das-gesamte-geheimgutachten-des-verfassungsschutzes-zur-afd). And it’s 02:00 CET so i’m not gonna search for the original direct links to the files.

Edit: first link being an old version, other two links being the recent version. Both reports being relevant though.ä

I should’ve included more context:

“Someone on mastodon.social reported me for supposedly supporting the German right-wing party.” […] Even though nowhere in their rules it says anything about this even being any offence."

3: […] Support for violent groups

They, openly for years, and now officially, are extrimists and their members systematically violent.

And I just noticed that, as so often with deepl, it first detected the german text as english, therefore translated (english)german to german, and malformed it, so in my working copy it read “meinen” instead of “mein”. Should have double checked that, but >01:30 CET demands its tribute.

Being a Nazi is not illegal. As no person themselve is illegal. Saying nazi stuff is illegal tho, so eg. Höcke (party leader) was sued for 13k€ for saying “alles für Deutschland”/“everything for germany”

right-wing party

Extremist right-wing party. With substantial parts legally being called Nazis.

Even though nowhere in their rules it says anything about this even being any offence.

3: […] Support for violent groups or events is prohibited.

Explains itself.

And which later turned out to be completely unsubstantial as many people suspected.

It’s not. “Many people”, aka. AfD supporters and the AfD themselves.

Oh, did he? He just stood there and claimed something. There was supposedly a great report with all the hard facts, but no one was allowed to see it. That’s not much different from “Yes, I did my homework, but then she (sic) ate my dog.”

(The original toot, translated from german)
Thing is, all contents were openly collected and sorted by 3rd parties already. The report is as relevant to anyone aware of any politics as the Principia Mathematica’s Section 54.43 is for thinking humans in order to prove that 1+1=2. The only usefulness lies in AfD supporters being unable to deny the obvious.

lol

Is that the builtin thingy?

Yeah … they’re the stereotypical .ml user.

By far not the first one.