Then return to the first clause.
Then return to the first clause.
Or, all accounts in the fedi are anonymous by nature, and if they need to be verified, they are verified on 3rd party sources.
Then it doesn’t matter.
No one should give a fuck if celebrities are here
Truthiness of a user should be determined with corroboration on 3rd party services.
It sounds like a furry cinematic universe
Lots of content here feels like someone beta testing their manifesto the FBI will find
If the pseudo account is banned for it’s vote choices, does that really address the issue of vote-banning?
This is excellent.
I’m curious about piefed now. Is it free of any explicit agenda?
Yep and they ban people as they see fit, across different communities, based on votes anywhere
Totally. And I find their chasing of voters distasteful. A user has the right to use the tools afforded them. There are no rules about voting, if they expect a certain behavior, they should remove downvotes entirely.
Saying something like “3 people here don’t think downvotes do xyz” is not a good argument. 3 is not significant, and is even still anecdotal
Person here who was from Reddit, and see downvotes as disagreement as a common usage.
Anecdotes amirite
The problem is if YOU choose to vote something, and a powermod admin dislikes your choice, they can, and do, ban people from many communities on that alone.
Already happening
Mod-admins are already doing this, even if you vote and don’t comment on something.
Yup. Following a user is creepy as fuck
Can you link to the GH issues?
Who cares? Like, none of this matters. Don’t put the fedivwrse on a pedestal
Nothing here is verified internally, and shouldn’t be. Centralization is antithetical to the decentralized nature of the fediverse.