

Artisanal hand carved phones
Artisanal hand carved phones
ah, makes sense. didn’t know that mbin hides the instance. Maybe as an additional link after the current one?
In any case: thanks for the work so far! Great service
for the links to a discussion, yes. But for a link to the community which has been decided, it’s probably more user friendly to just do the exclamation mark style instead of a normal link
Any chance of using the !-format for the links in the list? makes it easier to just visit and subscribe
y’all know that web 2.0 includes things like lemmy, right?
I’ve already seen people bringing back webrings
Oh, it’s paper. I thought it was an artsy slab of wood as a serving plate
I’d totally 100% speedrun that pizza
you’re not the first one seeing it as a wrist band :D
I used sichuan doubanjiang paste for the meat.
Not entirely sure what pappers are used in the chili oil, though
Some more notes if anyone wants to try:
fyi, you can link with a ! to instances, and they get automatically converted to local user instance links:
Abolutely necessarily.
it works like this:
@privateuser@mastodon.example.com
has a “followers only account”.@someuser@pixelfed.example.com
is a friend of above account, requested access and was granted. This now causes mastodon.example.com
to push all messages of @privateuser
to pixelfed.example.com
.@anotheruser@pixelfed.example.com
requests access, but gets ignored. But the pixelfed instance marks the user as “follows @privateuser
”@someuser
, the messages are shown as expected.@anotheruser
, they are also shown. Because PF basically does a database “select messages of users that the user follows”, without checking if the access was ever granted.Important to note, that this would not happen, if the messages weren’t already pushed to the server due to the “allowed” user
ActivityPub is a half-assed unfinished mess.
tried working on my own service and figured this one out very fast.
It’s amazing that it works at all. 98% of the stuff is not documented at all. and the stuff that is, can hardly be called documentation.
that’s the problem. you can’t really, without opening the image.
But so far, it doesn’t really appear to be a problem
the problem with this potential issue (if it indeed is one) is, that you don’t need to reply. just opening the DM is enough
fwiw I got the exact image URL in a DM a couple minutes ago. so at least they are not mapping the uuid of the image to a DMd fedi user
no, it’s a decentralised service on the decentralized internet
Saving for later
Fuck you :)