• 1 Post
  • 90 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • Sure seems like that’s what you’re doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto.

    We don’t care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn’t on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates.

    Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it.


  • Mastodon is more open than you think.

    You made a post to attempt to dispell what you consider a misunderstanding about BlueSky, yet your comment suggests you dont understand the Fediverse.

    Well, that problem also exists with mastodon.social

    No, it doesn’t. There are thousands of instances, some with hundreds of thousands of users. If you sort the instance list by active users, the population spreads out even more, because smaller instances have more active users.

    and a lot of the actual fediverse.

    Wrong again. Lemmy.world is about 30% of Lemmy, and less when you include Mbin, PieFed, etc.

    Its less distributed, but its still decentralised.

    I run a Fedi instance connected to hundreds of others. If one, even a large one, defederates me, it does not cut me off. If I ran a PDS, I’d be connected to BlueSky, and they can do what they want.

    You are rationalizing this to yourself because you like BlueSky.





  • Publishing this on PeerTube is also a problem. I mentioned this in another post, but to expand, I really, really, want to like PeerTube. But:

    • Many running servers don’t fully grasp the bandwidth requirements. The video I tried to watch in that post got “popular” (800 views) and it took 2 minutes to even get the progress bar to load. People will leave.
    • The federated nature is even more disjointed than Lemmy. It feels like a bunch of different sites still, which makes it feel like less content.

    IMO PeerTube could be great, but it has a lot of shortcomings that aren’t solved by adding features and fixing bugs.








  • The docs are super unclear, and written for those not familiar with ActivityPub.

    In future, we hope to develop a deeper integration between your social web profile and followers <> and your public website and registered members. To start with, though, they operate independently from one another.

    Your social web profile and followers are separate to the rest of your site and memberships, so you can think of it as a new, additional distribution channel.

    Emphasis mine. I think the setup is basically federating links in Mastodon style. So if you have a post available as a subscription, it will prompt a login after clicking through.