• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle

  • It’s not a cost issue. It’s about taking responsibility for maintaining a reliable, highly-available service.

    I’m pretty sure a solution will be found eventually. EU institutions need IT infrastructure to work and communicate like everybody else and all EU countries have highly available infrastructure like emergency services, secure channels etc. It’s just a matter of putting this task in the right context.

    It’s a very good thing that they’ve stumbled across this snag because solving it can also open the way for running more internet public services in the EU in an open, transparent manner, and may open the way to weaning ourselves off commercial platforms.

    Having a distributed, federated, secure, privacy-friendly and open EU-run messaging platform for example would be a huge boon for its citizens and have wide implications for other regions as well.


  • Their company is attempting to hijack TLS connections to eavesdrop on their browsing.

    It only works with websites that also offer a non-TLS version (which the hijacker uses to fetch content and then re-encrypts with their own certificate after they’ve snooped). But it doesn’t work if the website doesn’t have a non-TLS version and/or specifies it should only be used with TLS.

    Another way for it to work is for the company to get their own certificates on the machine, which is very easy if it’s a work-issued machine. But I’m guessing OP is not using a work machine.


  • And the crux of the matter:

    Less emotionally, I think it’s unwise to assume that an organization that has…

    • demonstrably and continuously made antisocial and sometimes deadly choices on behalf of billions of human beings and
    • allowed its products to be weaponized by covert state-level operations behind multiple genocides and hundreds (thousands? tens of thousands?) of smaller persecutions, all while
    • ducking meaningful oversight,
    • lying about what they do and know, and
    • treating their core extraction machines as fait-accompli inevitabilities that mustn’t be governed except in patently ineffective ways…

    …will be a good citizen after adopting a new, interoperable technical structure.



  • Can anyone help me understand what any Mastodon instance can possibly stand to gain by federating with Threads? The size disparity is absolutely massive. Anything going to Threads will be lost like a drop in the ocean and anything coming from Threads will be a deluge that drowns anything on Mastodon. You can limit your instance to only one of these but it’s still bad.

    Following Threads posters from a Mastodon client sounds ok at first, your users can get lots of Threads content, they get accustomed to it, and one day Meta changes the protocol and now you have to decide if you’re a Mastodon or a Threads client. Or your users start wondering why they’re using a subpar Threads client when most of their content is on there.