If you intended RFC to be a reference to IETF RFCs you should now it originally stood for Requests for Comments before simply being referred to as RFCs. (link) I didn’t have to read your document in detail, but it seems reasonable and well thought out.
If you intended RFC to be a reference to IETF RFCs you should now it originally stood for Requests for Comments before simply being referred to as RFCs. (link) I didn’t have to read your document in detail, but it seems reasonable and well thought out.