Every community I care about is dead

  • 1 Post
  • 16 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • Yote.zip@pawb.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    That seems to be their goal, though they are probably targeting specific instances that they notice most often. I think Yiffit tried to convince them to just block NSFW content or just specific communities instead of defederating entirely but apparently that didn’t work - I’m not in the loop on how the conversation went.



  • Yote.zip@pawb.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hey this is your friendly reminder to spread out in the Fediverse. Stop making communities on the big servers. Now all those users just lost a big chunk of content and they’re likely to leave Lemmy and spread the word about how the Fediverse will never work because of trigger-happy admins.





  • They have an explanation in the link - they effectively don’t want you hosting images on lemm.ee, as it has the potential to scale out of control for server costs. Whether that’s reasonable or not idk, but I can see where they’re coming from. Even though my server doesn’t have an upload limit, I personally just post all my images to catbox.moe in the meantime until we get some more data on how Lemmy scales.





  • I don’t know if the capability is already available but maybe there should be a greater emphasis on “public” vs “private” communities. Public communities could be like e.g. “memes”, whereas private ones could be local chat communities. Public ones would be available to everyone to browse and comment on, whereas private ones would only be available to yiffit.net users (and maybe whitelisting by server e.g. @pawb.social, or by requesting a per-user invite? though per-user invites would take a lot of extra effort to manage. Maybe a way to assign a user a “role” to access a group of communities, so you could give a “verified” role and the user would be able to access current and new local chat channels without further mod intervention.)

    I think there’s a lot of value in keeping private communities private and distinct from the larger fediverse. If I understand correctly, this seems to be sort of what beehaw.org is attempting to do. We recently had a bunch of trolls in one of pawb.social’s meta announcement threads - why do random users need to be able to participate in our local announcements?

    As a “fediverse” I understand the desire to be a giant meshnet of redundant servers, but maybe we can also have a return to the days of old with distinct local forums as well, running alongside that meshnet. Sometimes I would really like to be able to join a community and have it be a verified community, instead of just a topic that has regulars hanging around.


  • I’m going to guess that pict-rs (the image uploader behind Lemmy) is stripping the EXIF data that controls orientation, and that when you’re “editing” the pictures before uploading, your editing software is just modifying the EXIF orientation data without re-saving the raw image in a new orientation (as it should). I checked into the pict-rs source code a bit and it appears that’s what’s happening via a sledgehammer exiftool -all= call, but I don’t have any familiarity with the pict-rs codebase so I could be mistaken on where this is getting called. It should probably be preserving the Orientation tag with this exiftool call, as well as maybe some color profiles etc. In the short term, I would say upload your images to a different image service or use image editing software that forces a re-save of the image itself instead of just the EXIF data.

    exiftool all command


  • Yote.zip@pawb.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.mlAny Discord fediverse alternative???
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    it’s all done voluntarily in people’s free time.

    Firstly, Matrix has plenty of paid developers that work on it - this is not even close to a passion project made by volunteers in their free time.

    Secondly, I’m not saying the work is embarrassing (the work is nothing short of incredible), I’m saying the priority to leave this feature on the backburner for years is. They likely ended up with more important priorities and didn’t have enough resources to dedicate, but on a practical level the lack of hotjoin voice channels sticks out like a sore thumb to new users.

    I’ve been championing Matrix for about 4-5 years now, and it’s been so long since this feature was requested/promised that it’s at the point where I’m too “embarrassed” to try to convince people to switch anymore. People just expect this feature in a messaging platform nowadays, and if it’s not there they’re going to leave immediately. When this makes it into stable with a good UX, I’ll be back on the new user pipeline.


  • To be fair, Matrix is not exactly trying to be a “discord alternative” so much as an “all messaging platforms alternative”, but it’s still embarrassing that this feature is not present yet. It’s been heavily requested by the discord crowd for years, and should have been a higher priority.

    As for friends switching, at least Matrix has bridges and puppeting/double-puppeting support. Unfortunately, I don’t think discord voice channel bridging/puppeting will ever work, so it’s really not that useful in this instance. I know ripcord has voice channel interop so it is technically possible, but it’s probably too hacky/abusive to put in officially, and it would probably only work with puppeting.