• Cătă@libranet.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    @nutomic wouldn’t it help to turn your profile private?
    For example, on Friendica you can check the option below and you cannot access any information of that profile besides the bio, your official website and your contact info (Matrix or XMPP):

    I imagine that by having people interacting with your content from P29, your content gets sent over to them, so, in turn, Meta can sell that info to advertisers or allow them to target you otherwise.

    Or, more likely, they could use info they receive from the Fediverse to further track their users on the platform (say A from P29 likes my image of a giraffe on my profile. Now Meta will have that information available to advertisers, and they can advertise X with cheap plane tickets to Africa or something).

    Edit: Now that I think about it, they could also still be doing some sort of EEE-thingie that they did with XMPP

    • nutomic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Right that should help, but most content on Lemmy or Mastodon is completely public.

        • KelsonV@wandering.shop
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          @petrescatraian @nutomic I believe “unlisted” on Mastodon is somewhere in between - it’s expected to be publicly visible, but not publicized, i.e. it doesn’t show up in a server’s local or federated timeline. I’m not sure if it shows up when viewing someone’s profile when not logged in.

          Not that this would slow down an AP server that wanted to store it, of course!

        • nutomic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          There may be settings, but most users go with the default which means public posting.

        • KelsonV@wandering.shop
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          @petrescatraian @nutomic I think followers-only posts on Mastodon are closest. Make that your default posting mode and require approval for followers and it’s effectively a private profile. (Again, barring malicious ActivityPub servers)

            • KelsonV@wandering.shop
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              @petrescatraian @nutomic To some extent.

              When you mark a message as followers only, your server only sends it to your followers, and only shows it to your followers who are logged in

              But if one of your followers is on a malicious (or buggy) server, there’s nothing stopping *that* server from doing something it’s not supposed to with the data.

              IIRC it was CloudFlare’s implementation that recently had to fix a bug where followers-only posts were being shown publicly.