Perhaps I’ve misunderstood how Lemmy works, but from what I can tell Lemmy is resulting in fragmentation between communities. If I’ve got this wrong, or browsing Lemmy wrong, please correct me!

I’ll try and explain this with an example comparison to Reddit.

As a reddit user I can go to /r/technology and see all posts from any user to the technology subreddit. I can interact with any posts and communicate with anyone on that subreddit.

In Lemmy, I understand that I can browse posts from other instances from Beehaw, for example I could check out /c/[email protected], /c/[email protected], or many of the other technology communities from other instances, but I can’t just open up /c/technology in Beehaw and have a single view across the technology community. There could be posts I’m interested in on the technology@slrpnk instance but I wouldn’t know about it unless I specifically look at it, which adds up to a horrible experience of trying to see the latest tech news and conversation.

This adds up to a huge fragmentation across what was previously a single community.

Have I got this completely wrong?

Do you think this will change over time where one community on a specific instance will gain the market share and all others will evaporate away? And if it does, doesn’t that just place us back in the reddit situation?

EDIT: commented a reply here: https://beehaw.org/comment/288898. Thanks for the discussion helping me understand what this is (and isnt!)

  • 0xtero@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As a reddit user I can go to /r/technology and see all posts from any user to the technology subreddit. I can interact with any posts and communicate with anyone on that subreddit.

    Sure, but what about r/AmazingTechnology, r/InsaneTechnology, r/AskTechnology, r/TechnologyProTips etc etc. You’d have to be subbed to all of those in order to see all technology posts. And you probably are, because there’s no penalty in being subscribed to many subs.

    In Lemmy, I understand that I can browse posts from other instances from Beehaw, for example I could check out /c/[email protected], /c/[email protected], or many of the other technology communities from other instances, but I can’t just open up /c/technology in Beehaw and have a single view across the technology community.

    True. But in due time you’ll end up in situation where few of these (or maybe even one) becomes the “go to” community, because it has best/largest discussions - just like on Reddit. We’re still at the start of this journey. Also, the other instances are their “own thing”. Maybe that’s fragmentation, but essentially they might be aimed for completely different demographic (the users of that particular instance).

    And all posts from all of these communities are shown in your home feed, so it’s not like you miss discussions. There’s no penalty for subscribing to all of them.

    The only “fragmentation” that could happen is if one instance decides to defederate the other instances. That effectively “locks” their content from everyone else. And that is a shame. But it happens sometimes.

    • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hopefully something like the “multireddit” system can be implemented so users can make custom groups of communities to view as a single feed.

      • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I think that was what OP was talking about. Subscribing to all these feeds and then going to a single URL (/technology) that acts like an group, getting all of the posts that are grouped by the various magazines they’ve subscribed to.

        From a user stand point right now you have your home page feed (with everything in it) or you can go to your subscription page and select a subscription to see all the posts, having about view where you can see all your related content sounds super handy.

      • IniNew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could theoretically do that with accounts on different instances, and tailor each account to a specific list of magazines.

      • FeenisBoobicus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. Like the above poster mentioned, the same issue has existed on Reddit, but it’s had much more time for “winners and losers” to emerge from the battle for members. I do have to say I still don’t know how to search for communities here (I’m on Kbin), and it would be very convenient to be able to type “technology” or whatever and see a list of all named communities across all instances currently being federated with, and then have the option to aggregate them into a single feed.

    • duringoverflow@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      True. But in due time you’ll end up in situation where few of these (or maybe even one) becomes the “go to” community, because it has best/largest discussions - just like on Reddit. We’re still at the start of this journey. Also, the other instances are their “own thing”. Maybe that’s fragmentation, but essentially they might be aimed for completely different demographic (the users of that particular instance).

      while technically you’re correct, what I see as different that I think needs improvement, is the discoverability. It is needed to somehow when I search for e.g. technology to also see the various federated “technology” communities. If I have to manually search for an instance, find the correct handle, then go search for this handle in my own instance and only after that to be able to subscribe, it adds a difficulty on the level that I may never manage to know about the existence of some other communities (magazines). Apart from that, I agree it is totally fine to just let them organically grow and it will sort itself out on which one I may want to participate more.