• Microw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 months ago

    He was on the board, it’s not like it was his project or anything. Imo he wanted to create a protocol, not a platform. “Improve Activitypub” like they always claimed. But then Bluesky realized that they can simply build their own platform and be Twitter 2.0

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        Its community based so his opinion could be ignored, unlike when he’s on a board and his opinion was ignored.

    • heluecht@pirati.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      @Microw @dumbass No. He wouldn’t be happy with ActivityPub as well. He imagines a social network where no one can perform any moderation. He favours Nostr for exactly that reason. Bluesky has got moderation (just like the Fediverse) - which he dislikes.

        • Old_Geezer@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Moderation should always be client side. Server side should not be able to interfere or even read public content

          Yup. I don’t know if I agree re public content, but perhaps private messages should be encrypted, client side, before sending? That issue is one that bothers me about Mastodon.

      • Old_Geezer@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        No. He wouldn’t be happy with ActivityPub as well. He imagines a social network where no one can perform any moderation. He favours Nostr for exactly that reason. Bluesky has got moderation (just like the Fediverse) - which he dislikes.

        So? Like Usenet was back in the day before it became a pirate haven. Then email lists became it. LOL, People tend to ignore the extreme nut jobs regardless. I never saw any child porn on Usenet, but then I didn’t go looking for it. No doubt it existed too.