Following the other thread (550 upvotes and 366 comments at the moment: https://lemmy.world/post/16211417), one of the complaints that people had what that some communities only exist on lemmy.ml and don’t have alternatives on other instances.

Let’s discuss this and see if we can organize together.

I suggest to have one topic per comment so that is is easier to discuss.

            • AchtungDrempels@lemmy.worldEnglish
              5·
              5 months ago

              That’s great. If the admin of my instance would be this petty over something harmless like a downvote i would definitely leave the instance and i have never seen any admin make names of a downvoter public before.

      • azuth@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        4·
        5 months ago

        Do you think I will somehow be blackmailed because you tagged me dude?

        I am downvoting all participants in this grassroots campaign against lemmy developers and diverse political opinions.

        • rglullis@communick.newsEnglish
          10·
          5 months ago

          Nothing in this discussion is against Lemmy developers, and no one is trying to silence their voices. It’s just about creating/finding alternatives for those that are not interested in interacting with that instance.

          Also, me calling you out is not “blackmailing”, just me ensuring that downvotes like yours don’t become a pile-on.

          • azuth@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            3·
            5 months ago

            … Do you think I can just keep the last comment in mind or something?

            The discussion takes place in a post linking https://lemmy.world/post/16211417 . Surely that brings it into scope? The linked post begins

            I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy’s massive tankie censorship problem

            That does seem hostile to me. As does the drive to try and split communities

            Also, me calling you out is not “blackmailing”, just me ensuring that downvotes like yours don’t become a pile-on.

            You have to be kidding me. Why would tagging people who downvoted a post prevent a pile-on of downvotes? Is it a lemmy bug? Or is it that some people who would want to downvote your post would be intimidated by being ‘called out’? Maybe my English is bad but vote->get called-out seems to fit ‘blackmail’ just fine.

            • rglullis@communick.newsEnglish
              6·
              5 months ago

              Do you think I can just keep the last comment in mind or something?

              YES! It’s not like votes are worth anything here, but one of the reasons that voting mechanisms become completely useless as a way to signal quality conversations is when people blindly upvote/downvote everything just because they don’t like what is being said. People that do what you are doing end up showing more about themselves than about the one posting the comment that you didn’t like.

              As does the drive to try and split communities

              Would you feel so defensive about it if the communities were being hosted in a right-wing instance?

              Why would tagging people who downvoted a post prevent a pile-on of downvotes?

              Because it makes people think about what about the comment they are downvoting, instead of reflexively clicking on a button.

              vote->get called-out seems to fit ‘blackmail’

              It does not fit at all. I’m not trying to get anything out of you for my own benefit, and I am not doing it to submit you into compliance.

              • azuth@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                3·
                5 months ago

                YES! It’s not like votes are worth anything here, but one of the reasons that voting mechanisms become completely useless as a way to signal quality conversations is when people blindly upvote/downvote everything just because they don’t like what is being said. People that do what you are doing end up showing more about themselves than about the one posting the comment that you didn’t like.

                Indeed voting is worthless here, you do not get blocked from posting like reddit so there’s no silencing effect. Voting has always been about whether you agree or not with an opinion, not about the quality of a conversation (an abstract concept, realistically immeasurable). Yes reddit had/has the Reddiquette, it was not ever actually followed by the users. Turns out you can’t just redefine thing on a whim.

                Would you feel so defensive about it if the communities were being hosted in a right-wing instance?

                Right-wing as in neo-nazi ? I would not join a community in that server. Right wing as in pro-Israelor pro-capitalism? I do participate and get in meaningless flame wars when their callousness gets the best of me. I will not hold it against communities that do not deal with these issues and are just hosted on that instance.

                Because it makes people think about what about the comment they are downvoting, instead of reflexively clicking on a button.

                Think of what?

                It does not fit at all. I’m not trying to get anything out of you for my own benefit, and I am not doing it to submit you into compliance.

                Does not voting against your post not count as compliance?

                • rglullis@communick.newsEnglish
                  7·
                  5 months ago

                  Voting has always been about whether you agree or not with an opinion

                  No, that is absolutely false. Before Reddit’s Eternal September, voting was used as a way to signal quality content and it pretty much was followed by a good majority of the people.

                  Right-wing as in neo-nazi? I would not join a community in that server.

                  And this is precisely what people are talking about here. You might not see that way, but tankies are extremists. There are people that don’t want to join any conversation there, and therefore this is why they want alternatives.

                  Think of what?

                  It makes they think "what is so bad about this comment that it really warrants the downvote.

                  Does not voting against your post not count as compliance?

                  I didn’t ask you to remove the downvote. I asked you only to explain your reasoning, which is now quite clearly faulty.

                  • azuth@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                    3·
                    5 months ago

                    No, that is absolutely false. Before Reddit’s Eternal September, voting was used as a way to signal quality content and it pretty much was followed by a good majority of the people.

                    Ah, yes the good old times. Just don’t take off your nostalgia-tinted glasses.

                    And this is precisely what people are talking about here. You might not see that way, but tankies are extremists. There are people that don’t want to join any conversation there, and therefore this is why they want alternatives.

                    The issue with Nazism is not that it is extreme, that it skews too much to the right. Nazism is inherently evil because it claims certain peoples are not worth existing and should be eliminated.

                    It makes they think "what is so bad about this comment that it really warrants the downvote.

                    I wonder what could make you think of honesty.

                    I didn’t ask you to remove the downvote. I asked you only to explain your reasoning, which is now quite clearly faulty.

                    Of course not. You wanted to make an example of me and the other guy to prevent a pile-on, that is more people downvoting you. You are blackmailing them by showing them what could happen to them. Obviously it’s not working because it’s just some posts on an internet forum.