I have seen many comments saying that lemmy.world sucks, and sh.itjust.works is good. I have seen that lemmy.world apparently has a very poor reputation among other instances. Why? After a quick look, sh.itjust.works doesn’t look much different to me. Can anyone explain?

Edit: many good replies. the conclusion I’m drawing is that for my purposes it doesn’t really matter. I appreciate everyone who responded

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    … the root of the problem is your apparent compulsion to call people “toxic” and “assholes” for having different views.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Ah yes, the “no u” gambit. Classic, deadly, refined. The most elegant of rebuttals. A refuge for only the sharpest of wits.

      Anyways, do you mean different views like say, someone holding different (and by your own admission, quite common) opinions about how your conduct reflects on your character…?

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’re not calling you that for having different views. They’re calling you that for making up reasons to offend yourself and acting like a toxic drama queen. And the ratio shows they aren’t alone.

      • zante@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        And what is your reason for adding your personal attack to this already well populated debate ?

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 days ago

          You’re doing it again. Me pointing out a simple fact. That you brought up two different things which the author never even addressed. In order to turn yourself into some victim. That is a simple fact. If you feel that it is an attack on you to have that pointed out. Perhaps you need to look inwards.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              You should really think about how a fairly straightforward reframing of your actions reads, even to you, like an intentionally negative characterization (or even an attack). If thats how it looks to you, imagine how it must look to other people.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              4 days ago

              An account of your actions is not an opinion. Please take the gaslighting somewhere else.