• Thor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not 100% sure what you’re referring to when it comes to being honest about masking. If you’re referring to how some governments said “Don’t mask” and then were like “Nvm, y’all should put on masks” then I kinda disagree.

    The reason it started off as “Don’t mask” is because we had very little information to go of off. One very real hypothesis was that masking was gonna make things worse, because we weren’t sure if it was airborne or not yet, and that masking might make people touch their faces more often.

    Basically, if COVID wasn’t airborne, masking could very well have made things worse, because it wouldn’t protect against anything, it would only make people touch their faces more often. So I 100% understand the decision they made.

    • sarsaparilyptus@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      One very real hypothesis was that masking was gonna make things worse, because we weren’t sure if it was airborne or not yet, and that masking might make people touch their faces more often.

      Was that actually real? I was under the impression that this was a red herring used to make sure lab and medical professionals got ahold of PPE before the general public could hoard it all.

    • crank@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      One very real hypothesis was that masking was gonna make things worse, because we weren’t sure if it was airborne or not yet, and that masking might make people touch their faces more often

      well I’m sure someone somewhere might have thought that but it was never a credible argument being made by anyone worth listening to.

      if COVID wasn’t airborne,

      COVID was obviously an airborne disease immediately. It is a quickly spreading resp disease. which has characteristics of being airborne. the only question was what the role of other mechanisms might have been. which is why we were all washing our hands and wiping down the cereal boxes. But the idea that it was not airborne at all I am sorry to say: totally ludicrous.

      Anyway this comment bring to the front of my mind a major moderation problem; I am at a loss as to how to address it.

      • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My understanding was that it was genuinely uncertain early on whether it was being spread in large respiratory droplets, and therefore whether there was a higher chance of spread via surfaces/touch, or if it was being spread via aerosolized droplets. These are two different transmission vectors that would react differently to masking by the general public. On the other hand, my understanding is that some governments were slow to recommend masking even as it became clear that Covid was airborne and that masking would decrease transmission, because of concerns about supply.

        I’m a little fuzzy on timelines, though, and I don’t have any sources so take this comment with an enormous grain of salt.